Pay special attention to three figures: percent spent on fundraising, 
total assets and salaries. Also examine percent spent on management 
and general expenses and look for unusual activity in the notes.  
It is important to compare apples with apples and oranges with 
oranges. Compare one organization's assets to other organizations 
in the same field. For example, organizations which run camps 
for children tend to own more assets than your typical nonprofit 
because they like to own the buildings, land, and physical structures 
necessary for operating a camp and like to have endowments which 
can provide them with a secure financial future and smooth out 
income fluctuations. New organizations often have higher start 
up costs than more mature organizations, so one should take this 
into account in evaluating their management and fundraising expenses. 
Again, compare new groups with other new groups.   
The National Charities Information Bureau (NCIB) requires organizations 
to spend at least 60% of the annual budget on program activities. 
A rule of thumb is that fundraising expenses should not exceed 
25%. The economist Richard Steinberg argues that donors should 
completely ignore average fundraising expenses, on the grounds 
that average fundraising costs do not reflect marginal fundraising 
costs. However, Steinberg's view is in the minority and ignores 
the fact that by giving to organizations with low average fundraising 
expenses, donors can provide incentives to organizations not to 
waste money competing against each other for greater market share. 
  
NCIB also requires organizations not to keep assets higher than 
twice annual operating expenses. The justification for this requirement 
is that contributors generally wish their donations to go to work 
immediately, funding programs today, not invested for a rainy 
day tomorrow. Charities always have the option of starting an 
endowment funded only by gifts that donors have specified for 
that purpose. Obviously, if an organization invested all of their 
funds and *never* spent any on current programs, no one would 
ever benefit from the donor's generosity.   
[NCIB and the Donor Advisory Service of the Better Business Bureau merged in 2001 to form the Wise Giving Alliance -- http://www.give.org. --Ed.] 
 Comparing apples with apples is equally important when looking 
at executive salaries. Anyone who has ever worked for a nonprofit 
will probably tell you that most people working in the field are 
underpaid. A few top executives of very large organizations do 
enjoy salaries that are sometimes over $100,000. However, compare 
their salaries to what managers of for-profit corporations of 
equal size, with similar responsibilities, make. Some of the highest 
salaries go to the top managers of health organizations or hospitals; 
typically, these organizations must offer compensation generous 
enough to attract talented doctors who can command even higher 
salaries in the private sector.   
However, encouraging slightly lower than private market salaries 
is a good tradition for the nonprofit sector. Lower salaries insure 
that the people who fill these positions are there because they 
care about the organization's mission, and not just for the money. 
Nonprofits perform services which are difficult for donors to 
evaluate, so the people responsible for delivering these goods 
and services must be especially trustworthy. Lower salaries is 
one way to screen out individuals with less than noble motives. 
  
Cliff Landesman 
  
September, 1994
  
Internet NonProfit Center   
 
For more about interpreting the finances of nonprofits, see http://www.nonprofits.org/npofaq/0/1486.html -- Ed. 
 
  
 
Reposted in new format, 7/5/05 -- PB |