We were asked on 6/21/01 "Where is the online Donor Defense Kit that the Boeing Employee Community Fund website said I could find on your site?" 
 
It's included in this file; see below.  
 
Checking the requesting organization's information at Guidestar -- http://www.guidestar.org -- is also a good idea.  For larger organizations that solicit nationally, the Wise Giving Alliance of the Better Business Bureau -- http://www.give.org/index.asp -- is another source of cautions and reassurance. 
 
  
 
Donor Protection Kit  
			   
 DON'T JUST SAY "NO" TO SOLICITATIONS, SAY:   
-- "I never give cash." (I'm no fool.)   
-- "I give to other causes, thank you." or: "I don't give to organizations 
in your field; I focus on organizations that..."   
-- "This is the first time I've heard about your organization. 
I prefer that you not initially approach me by phone. Please write 
to me instead." (If you are reading a written solicitation, do 
a little homework before you give. Read their annual report, consult 
the guides, etc.)   
IF YOU ARE SUSPICIOUS, TRY ASKING:   
-- "Are you a volunteer or a professional fundraiser?"   
-- "How much does your group spend on fundraising. How much do 
you pay your highest paid executive? How large are your assets?" 
  
-- "Do you meet all of the National Charities Information Bureau's 
Standards in Philanthropy?"   
IF THE ORGANIZATION APPEALS TO YOU, YOU MIGHT REPLY:   
-- "I'd like to learn more, please send me your annual report." 
  
-- "Thank you for letting me know about your work. I would first 
like to consult with a third party, such as the American Institute 
of Philanthropy, before making a donation."   
IF YOU RECEIVE TOO MANY APPEALS BY MAIL:   
-- Inform the organizations whom you support and who write to 
you. Let them know that you don't like excessively frequent appeals. 
If you are already giving, they will listen! They don't want to 
irritate you. You also have every right to request that they not 
share your name with others. The American Institute of Philanthropy 
has "Seven Tips" on reducing unwanted solicitations at http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/seventips.html. 
  
KEEP IN MIND:   
-- You can use a solicitation as an opportunity to encourage responsible 
practices and stress the importance of accountability.   
-- If you plan your donations, you will be in a strong position 
to say "no" with pride, not guilt. You can't give on this occasion 
because you do give on other occasions.   
-- You can budget your gifts, THEN splurge. There is nothing wrong 
with impulsive giving for the fun of it. But there will be many 
opportunities to splurge with organizations you know well, without 
encouraging irresponsible solicitations.   
(FOR THE ACADEMICALLY MINDED:)   
-- There are two kinds of nonprofit organizations: those that 
provide a service or product that donors can easily evaluate and 
those that don't. In some instances, donors can directly observe 
an organization in action (public radio or museums, for example). 
If a donor can directly observe the work of an organization, the 
contributor doesn't necessarily need to see an annual report or 
do any homework. The giver can just donate whatever the service 
seems to be worth to her. In the instance of services such a public 
radio which are non-excludable "public goods" this will amount 
to how much she would be willing to pay if the organization held 
all of its goods and services hostage to her individual donation. 
  
--On the other hand, most charities perform work that donors don't 
see directly. Donors must trust that the organizations are using 
their money wisely. Donors shouldn't trust an organization blindly, 
however. If staff are underpaid, then they are probably not in 
their jobs for the money. That's one way to be assured of honorable 
motivations. Reading a group's literature and consulting the watchdogs 
will enlighten you in other ways.   
The State of Maryland has a giving wisely page that offers a few 
additional tips; see http://www.sos.state.md.us/Charity/Givewise.htm.   
--Cliff Landesman, Fall, 1994   
Revised, 9-96  
 
  
 
Prepared 6/21/01; updated with the full text 10/5/05 -- PB 
 
 
 |